digital slowmad

Digital Slowmad newsletter

20 September 2023


📊 Crypto portfolio update

Exposure: 13.3%

Net return: 685.9%

Comments: This week, the US Federal Reserve officially transitioned into its easing cycle with a rate cut of 50bps.

The market reaction has so far been positive as crypto prices went up across the board in the days following the news.

But is it really so simple a case of "Fed cut = market up"? Are we in the 'banana zone' now? Should we be aggressively positioned for a bull run?

Such a left-curve view is appealing... but is it really that easy?

Perhaps. The left-curve meme is real and overthinking things is often the mid-curve take.

This being said, though prices are moving up we have yet to see signs of new bullish price structures. BTC remains caught in a range and most altcoins are still in a technical downtrend.

total3 downtrend

So until there's a material change to the situation, I'd prefer to err on the side of caution and stay on the sidelines.

If I'm wrong and this is indeed the turning point before the next bullish leg up, there'll be plenty of time and opportunity to hop onto the bandwagon.

Current allocation:

Details available in private group


🧩 My new crypto gaming thesis

I just finished writing my new/updated thesis on crypto gaming and shared it with the private group.

A partial snapshot:

The 2021 GameFi bubble taught the sector one thing: When game assets are primarily seen as "get-rich-quick investments" rather than instruments of fun, speculators will ultimately ruin the ecosystem.

To remind you of what happened last cycle, here's the token charts of AXS and JEWEL:

AXS historical

AXS

JEWEL historical

JEWEL

These tokens got pumped to the moon by speculators who had no real interest in the game and who caused prices to crash once they extracted 95% of the financial value and left. Meanwhile, real players who bought the token got rekt because they held with the intention of using it to play the game.

In the end, sincere players got rinsed as pure speculators walked away rich, leaving behind a devastated ecosystem and a mob of angry bagholders.

And when the majority of players see their game assets/tokens fall -95% like this, it's over for the project.

Today, smart game devs have learned the lesson. They know pure speculators will destroy their game ecosystem and are taking every precaution to minimize price speculation of their game assets (especially tokens). They want their game assets to be an instrument of enhancing the game experience, NOT an instrument of "getting rich quick".

By the way, this is why the SHRAP token is designed to have no reliable means of profit. Unlike AXS (which was used to produce Axies to make money) or JEWEL (which was used in the gardens to make money), there is no direct way to make money with SHRAP.

The only sure way to make money with SHRAP is if the game becomes a hit and a lot of people participate in the UGC aspect. In this way, the price of SHRAP is aligned with the project fundamentals, NOT whether people can "make money" with the token.

Study the tokenomic structures of the biggest upcoming games and you'll find a similar theme. Game devs today do not want speculators to ruin their games, and understandably so.

Imagine you're a crypto game developer who spent the last 3 years grinding through the bear market with your blood, sweat and tears while the whole sector is continuously dunked on. You've endured tremendous pain, stress, doubt, ridicule, and the fear of going bankrupt the entire time.

By some miracle you beat the odds and create a game that people love to play as the bull market comes around and the price of game assets starts going up.

Which group of people would you rather reward?

Your team, seed backers, players and content creators who contribute to the game ecosystem?

Or the pure speculators who contribute nothing and just want your token to pump so they can dump it and get rich, and destroy your game ecosystem as a result?

The answer is blindingly obvious.

As a game developer, you want to reward those who provide ongoing, real contributions to your game ecosystem; Not to mercenary capital who just want to pump and dump your game assets.

This may seem like common sense but I can assure you - this way of thinking was not common at all back in 2021.

The thesis explains how I believe the crypto gaming landscape has changed, what gaming asset(s) I'm buying, and why.

It will eventually be released to the public but private members will get early access + some time to get positioned first.

Many in the industry have written off gaming as dead but I believe the narrative will pop off again in the coming bull market.


📝 Admin update


🎺 Julian Lee, James Morrison & Don Burrows

The best minute I spent this week. Have a listen.


💭 Thought of the week


Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend. 🥃

Cheers,
Slowmad

P.S. If you have any questions or feedback, let me know at: chris[at]digitalslowmad[dot]com

Get future newsletter issues in your inbox: